Tanaji Alat vs Ankush Bodhale Advocate - Patil Anil Raghunath — 450/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130004992017
Filing Number
710/2017
Filing Date
08-May-2017
Registration No
450/2017
Registration Date
09-Jun-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tanaji Alat
Adv. Zalte Rahul T
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ankush Bodhale Advocate - Patil Anil Raghunath
-
2.Sitaram Bodhale
-
3.Suresh Bodhale
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
28-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
31-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
04-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
05-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
15-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Jt Cjjd And JMFC Barshi
-
18-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
22-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Jt Cjjd And JMFC Barshi
-
15-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
12-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
06-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
12-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
14-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
27-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
03-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
10-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
26-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
05-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
15-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
15-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
19-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
28-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
20-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
18-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
18-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
12-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
21-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
06-May-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
13-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
08-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
16-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
03-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
20-Jan-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
16-Jan-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
08-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
08-Nov-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
15-Oct-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
22-Sep-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
12-Aug-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
26-Jul-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
12-Jul-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
16-Jun-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
19-Apr-2022
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
24-Mar-2022
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
02-Mar-2022
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
07-Feb-2022
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
18-Jan-2022
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
05-Jan-2022
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
21-Dec-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
16-Dec-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
22-Nov-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
25-Oct-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
06-Oct-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
17-Sep-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
01-Sep-2021
Issues
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
06-Apr-2021
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
23-Dec-2020
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
05-Sep-2020
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
25-Jun-2020
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
11-Feb-2020
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
13-Nov-2019
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
19-Aug-2019
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
17-Apr-2019
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
15-Dec-2018
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
03-Sep-2018
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
31-Jul-2018
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
15-Mar-2018
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
25-Jan-2018
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
22-Dec-2017
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. 450/2017 (Tanaji Alat v. Ankush Bodhale Advocate & Others) The court granted an interim injunction in favor of petitioner Tanaji Alat regarding disputed land (Gat No. 1/2, 1 hectare 72 are) at Dhamangaon, Barshi. Though defendants admitted plaintiff's ownership and possession under a 2011 compromise decree, they obstructed his possession in May 2017. The court found plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and obstruction would cause irreparable loss. Defendants' technical objections (non-joinder of parties, boundary discrepancies) were deemed without merit. The order temporarily restrains defendants from interfering with plaintiff's possession until suit disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Dec-2017
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
19-Dec-2017
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
16-Dec-2017
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
11-Dec-2017
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
11-Dec-2017
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
23-Nov-2017
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
08-Nov-2017
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
27-Oct-2017
Order
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
05-Oct-2017
Order
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
15-Sep-2017
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
23-Aug-2017
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
02-Aug-2017
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
24-Jul-2017
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
14-Jul-2017
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
27-Jun-2017
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
13-Jun-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 450/2017
Case Summary: R.C.S. 450/2017 (Tanaji Alat v. Ankush Bodhale Advocate & Others) The court granted an interim injunction in favor of petitioner Tanaji Alat regarding disputed land (Gat No. 1/2, 1 hectare 72 are) at Dhamangaon, Barshi. Though defendants admitted plaintiff's ownership and possession under a 2011 compromise decree, they obstructed his possession in May 2017. The court found plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and obstruction would cause irreparable loss. Defendants' technical objections (non-joinder of parties, boundary discrepancies) were deemed without merit. The order temporarily restrains defendants from interfering with plaintiff's possession until suit disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts