Sadanand Bharati vs Rangnath Sagar — 283/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 6. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO130003282018

Issues

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

341/2018

Filing Date

26-04-2018

Registration No

283/2018

Registration Date

27-04-2018

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 6
IA/1/2022 Classification : Amendment of the pleadings Section Sadanand BharatiRangnath Sagar
IA/2/2023 Classification : Permission to file Written Statement after 30 or 90 days Section Sadanand BharatiRangnath Sagar

Petitioner(s)

Sadanand Bharati

Adv. Gund Sahadev Mahadev

Respondent(s)

Rangnath Sagar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

10-04-2026

Issues

13-03-2026

Issues

10-02-2026

Issues

12-01-2026

Issues

02-12-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

17-08-2023
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 283/2018 - Sadanand Bharati v. Rangnath Sagar The court rejected Respondent No. 4's application for delay condonation in filing a written statement, imposed costs of ₹300 on the respondent, and directed that the written statement be filed within the next hearing date before being accepted on record. The court found that while the respondent claimed delayed receipt of documents justified the delay, accepting the written statement would serve natural justice and allow a fair trial on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 283/2018 - Sadanand Bharati v. Rangnath Sagar The court rejected Respondent No. 4's application for delay condonation in filing a written statement, imposed costs of ₹300 on the respondent, and directed that the written statement be filed within the next hearing date before being accepted on record. The court found that while the respondent claimed delayed receipt of documents justified the delay, accepting the written statement would serve natural justice and allow a fair trial on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case