Sarun @ Ruksana Aalam Pathan vs Usman Babulal Mirza Advocate - Patil Nandkishor Narayan — 245/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130003022021
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
331/2021
Filing Date
23-04-2021
Registration No
245/2021
Registration Date
30-04-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarun @ Ruksana Aalam Pathan
Adv. Khupsare Milind Jayshankar
Mumtaj Isub Shaikh
Adv. Khupsare Milind Jayshankar
Shakira Harun Shaikh
Adv. Khupsare Milind Jayshankar
Respondent(s)
Usman Babulal Mirza Advocate - Patil Nandkishor Narayan
Ismail Babulal Mirza
Ayub Babulal Mirza
Nayyum Tayyab Mirza
Innus Tayyab Mirza
Munir Tayyab Mirza
Fatima Tayyab Mirza
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 245/2021 Outcome: The court partially allowed the petitioners' plea. Respondent No. 3 was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the petitioners, and her affidavit will be taken on record. For Respondents 1, 2, 4, and 7, the court ordered them to pay Rs. 400 as cost and directed their affidavits be placed on record. The court set aside earlier orders dismissing the petitioners' case and accepted the respondents' affidavits, noting their delay in filing was justified and reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 245/2021 Outcome: The court partially allowed the petitioners' plea. Respondent No. 3 was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the petitioners, and her affidavit will be taken on record. For Respondents 1, 2, 4, and 7, the court ordered them to pay Rs. 400 as cost and directed their affidavits be placed on record. The court set aside earlier orders dismissing the petitioners' case and accepted the respondents' affidavits, noting their delay in filing was justified and reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts