Shevantabai Babu Kapse vs Ramprabhu Gopinath Kapse — 5/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21 K11. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130002112019
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
222/2019
Filing Date
25-02-2019
Registration No
5/2019
Registration Date
27-02-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shevantabai Babu Kapse
Adv. Mukeri Shabana R.
Respondent(s)
Ramprabhu Gopinath Kapse
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 06-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 01-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 17-12-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 5/2019: Shevantabai Babu Kapse v. Ramprabhu Gopinath Kapse Outcome: The objection petition was rejected with costs of Rs. 2,000 to be paid by the objector to the Decree Holder. The objector claimed independent tenancy rights over agricultural land and sought to prevent execution of a prior decree. The court found the objector failed to produce valid, authenticated documentary evidence of tenancy established before the original 1980 decree and rejected his claim as baseless and frivolous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 5/2019: Shevantabai Babu Kapse v. Ramprabhu Gopinath Kapse Outcome: The objection petition was rejected with costs of Rs. 2,000 to be paid by the objector to the Decree Holder. The objector claimed independent tenancy rights over agricultural land and sought to prevent execution of a prior decree. The court found the objector failed to produce valid, authenticated documentary evidence of tenancy established before the original 1980 decree and rejected his claim as baseless and frivolous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts