Babasaheb Laxman Mirgane vs Saraswati Shivaji Mirgane Advocate - Karanjkar Pravin Parshuram — 144/2020

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO130001772020

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

179/2020

Filing Date

12-02-2020

Registration No

144/2020

Registration Date

13-02-2020

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
IA/1/2021 Classification : Permission to file Written Statement after 30 or 90 days Section Babasaheb Laxman MirganeSaraswati Shivaji Mirgane

Petitioner(s)

Babasaheb Laxman Mirgane

Adv. Shinde Nitin Gajendra

Respondent(s)

Saraswati Shivaji Mirgane Advocate - Karanjkar Pravin Parshuram

Namrata Shivaji Mirgane

Shivkanya Shivaji MirganeRepresented by Guardian - Namrata Shivaji Mirgane

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

17-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

02-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

02-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

10-11-2021
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 144/2020 Outcome: The court allowed the defendants' application for delay condonation. The 3-month delay in filing their written statement and counter claim was condoned due to COVID-19 pandemic constraints. Defendants were permitted to file their written statement and counter claim on record, subject to paying Rs. 200/- as cost to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 144/2020 Outcome: The court allowed the defendants' application for delay condonation. The 3-month delay in filing their written statement and counter claim was condoned due to COVID-19 pandemic constraints. Defendants were permitted to file their written statement and counter claim on record, subject to paying Rs. 200/- as cost to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case