Siddheshwar Bibhishan Satpute vs Bebinaj Alias Bibinaj A kadar Sayyad — 145/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130001642026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
173/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
145/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Siddheshwar Bibhishan Satpute
Adv. GHODAKE ROHIT RAJENDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bebinaj Alias Bibinaj A kadar Sayyad
-
2.Mahamud Navaj A Kadar Sayyad
-
3.Khatib A Kadar Sayyad
-
4.A Shakur A kadar Shaikh
-
5.Bajrang Bibhishan Satpute
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
DecreeView PDF
Case Summary: 145/2026 The National Lok Adalat at Barshi resolved a dispute between Siddheshwar Bibhishan Satpute (petitioner) and Bebinaj Alias Bibinaj A Kadar Sayyad, Mahamud Navaj A Kadar Sayyad, and Khatib A Kadar Sayyad (respondents) through compromise settlement. The parties agreed to settle the matter, and the Lok Adalat passed an award on March 14, 2026, accepting the settlement terms. Any court fees paid by the parties shall be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
13-Mar-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 145/2026
Case Summary: 145/2026 The National Lok Adalat at Barshi resolved a dispute between Siddheshwar Bibhishan Satpute (petitioner) and Bebinaj Alias Bibinaj A Kadar Sayyad, Mahamud Navaj A Kadar Sayyad, and Khatib A Kadar Sayyad (respondents) through compromise settlement. The parties agreed to settle the matter, and the Lok Adalat passed an award on March 14, 2026, accepting the settlement terms. Any court fees paid by the parties shall be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts