Kamini Vilas Gondil vs Arjun Tukaram Langote Advocate - Vaidya Ravindra U — 109/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Order. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130001482021
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
157/2021
Filing Date
20-02-2021
Registration No
109/2021
Registration Date
23-02-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamini Vilas Gondil
Adv. Jadhavar Shivaji Ramchandrarao
Respondent(s)
Arjun Tukaram Langote Advocate - Vaidya Ravindra U
Sojarbai Arjun Langote
Adv. Gund Samadhan Rambhau
Yuvraj Vilas Gondil
Adv. Mukane Yogesh Mahadeo
Vilas Krushna Gondil
Adv. Gund Samadhan Rambhau
Shelendrakumar Mahadev Mukane
Adv. Vaidya Ravindra U
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Order
Order
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Order |
| 23-04-2026 | Order |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 109/2021 Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. Petitioner Kamini Vilas Gondil sought to restrain defendants Arjun Tukaram Langote and Sojarbai Arjun Langote from constructing a 20-foot vehicle road on ancestral property at village Shendri, alleging they had encroached 48 gunthas. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, noting contradictions: she claimed encroachment from the east and south-north sides but sought relief regarding construction on the west side. Since no official measurement was conducted, the private measurement evidence and photographs were insufficient to prove encroachment. The court concluded there was no bona fide contest regarding the alleged west-side encroachment and dismissed all related claims for temporary injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 109/2021 Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. Petitioner Kamini Vilas Gondil sought to restrain defendants Arjun Tukaram Langote and Sojarbai Arjun Langote from constructing a 20-foot vehicle road on ancestral property at village Shendri, alleging they had encroached 48 gunthas. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, noting contradictions: she claimed encroachment from the east and south-north sides but sought relief regarding construction on the west side. Since no official measurement was conducted, the private measurement evidence and photographs were insufficient to prove encroachment. The court concluded there was no bona fide contest regarding the alleged west-side encroachment and dismissed all related claims for temporary injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts