Kamini Vilas Gondil vs Arjun Tukaram Langote Advocate - Vaidya Ravindra U — 109/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Order. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Order Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO130001482021

Filing Number

157/2021

Filing Date

20-Feb-2021

Registration No

109/2021

Registration Date

23-Feb-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi

Judge

3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamini Vilas Gondil

    Adv. Jadhavar Shivaji Ramchandrarao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arjun Tukaram Langote Advocate - Vaidya Ravindra U

  2. 2.Sojarbai Arjun Langote

    Adv. Gund Samadhan Rambhau

  3. 3.Yuvraj Vilas Gondil

    Adv. Mukane Yogesh Mahadeo

  4. 4.Vilas Krushna Gondil

    Adv. Gund Samadhan Rambhau

  5. 5.Shelendrakumar Mahadev Mukane

    Adv. Vaidya Ravindra U

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Order

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Order

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  11. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  12. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  13. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  14. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  15. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  16. 07-Feb-2025

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  17. 04-Nov-2024

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  18. 26-Sep-2024

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  19. 18-Jul-2024

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  20. 04-May-2024

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  21. 21-Mar-2024

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  22. 13-Feb-2024

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  23. 17-Jan-2024

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  24. 02-Dec-2023

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  25. 30-Oct-2023

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  26. 20-Sep-2023

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  27. 23-Aug-2023

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  28. 15-Jul-2023

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  29. 14-Jun-2023

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  30. 29-Apr-2023

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  31. 29-Mar-2023

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  32. 27-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  33. 02-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  34. 03-Jan-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  35. 01-Dec-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  36. 08-Nov-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  37. 14-Oct-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  38. 12-Sep-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  39. 01-Sep-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  40. 12-Aug-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  41. 05-Aug-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  42. 25-Jul-2022

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: 109/2021 Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. Petitioner Kamini Vilas Gondil sought to restrain defendants Arjun Tukaram Langote and Sojarbai Arjun Langote from constructing a 20-foot vehicle road on ancestral property at village Shendri, alleging they had encroached 48 gunthas. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, noting contradictions: she claimed encroachment from the east and south-north sides but sought relief regarding construction on the west side. Since no official measurement was conducted, the private measurement evidence and photographs were insufficient to prove encroachment. The court concluded there was no bona fide contest regarding the alleged west-side encroachment and dismissed all related claims for temporary injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  43. 25-Jul-2022

    Issues

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  44. 08-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  45. 04-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  46. 15-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  47. 05-May-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  48. 05-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  49. 03-Mar-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  50. 03-Mar-2022

    Steps

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  51. 16-Feb-2022

    Order

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  52. 31-Jan-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  53. 19-Jan-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  54. 15-Dec-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  55. 26-Nov-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  56. 26-Oct-2021

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  57. 16-Sep-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  58. 26-Aug-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  59. 13-Jul-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  60. 29-Jun-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  61. 28-Apr-2021

    First Order

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  62. 20-Mar-2021

    First Order

    4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi

  63. 01-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 20-Feb-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 109/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 109/2021 Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. Petitioner Kamini Vilas Gondil sought to restrain defendants Arjun Tukaram Langote and Sojarbai Arjun Langote from constructing a 20-foot vehicle road on ancestral property at village Shendri, alleging they had encroached 48 gunthas. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, noting contradictions: she claimed encroachment from the east and south-north sides but sought relief regarding construction on the west side. Since no official measurement was conducted, the private measurement evidence and photographs were insufficient to prove encroachment. The court concluded there was no bona fide contest regarding the alleged west-side encroachment and dismissed all related claims for temporary injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case