Deshbhushan Shantinath Danole vs Indrajeet Shantinath Danole — 129/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section9order20rule18. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO130001472026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

156/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

129/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Section9order20rule18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Deshbhushan Shantinath Danole

    Adv. PATIL PRASHANT SHRIKANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Indrajeet Shantinath Danole

  2. 2.Sanmati Bharat Salgarkar

  3. 3.Mangal alias Pushpa Hiralal Narkhed

  4. 4.Sushila Shantinath Danole

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    DecreeView PDF

    The National Lok Adalat at Barshi resolved a dispute between Deshbhushan Shantinath Danole (petitioner) and Indrajeet Shantinath Danole and others (respondents) through a settlement compromise. The parties reached an agreed resolution regarding land and property matters, with specific land divisions and financial adjustments allocated among the disputants as detailed in the award. All court fees paid were ordered to be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 129/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The National Lok Adalat at Barshi resolved a dispute between Deshbhushan Shantinath Danole (petitioner) and Indrajeet Shantinath Danole and others (respondents) through a settlement compromise. The parties reached an agreed resolution regarding land and property matters, with specific land divisions and financial adjustments allocated among the disputants as detailed in the award. All court fees paid were ordered to be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case