Rajendrakumar Bhanudas Shinde vs Jayashri Baliram Shinde — 251/2022
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHSO120007212022
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
739/2022
Filing Date
08-07-2022
Registration No
251/2022
Registration Date
11-07-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Barshi
Judge
4-Jt.C.J.S.D Barshi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendrakumar Bhanudas Shinde
Adv. Jadhav Sanjay V
Respondent(s)
Jayashri Baliram Shinde
Savankumar Baliram Shinde
Rohan Baliram Shinde
Roshani Baliram Shinde
Sitaram Bhanudas Shinde
Vijaykumar Bhaudas Shinde
Indumati Bhanudas Shinde
Mahadevi Nagnath Mane
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt.C.J.S.D Barshi
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 06-04-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 20-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 02-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case 251/2022 Summary Petition Dismissed with Costs Rajendrakumar Bhanudas Shinde's petition under CrPC Section 65 challenging an interim order was dismissed by the Barshi court. The court found that Shinde failed to establish the required conditions for relief: that respondents committed a first offense, that balance of convenience favored him, and that irreparable injury would result if the order were not granted. The court upheld the interim order restraining respondent Savankumar Baliram Shinde from interfering with disputed joint family property and ordered Shinde to pay costs to respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 251/2022 Summary Petition Dismissed with Costs Rajendrakumar Bhanudas Shinde's petition under CrPC Section 65 challenging an interim order was dismissed by the Barshi court. The court found that Shinde failed to establish the required conditions for relief: that respondents committed a first offense, that balance of convenience favored him, and that irreparable injury would result if the order were not granted. The court upheld the interim order restraining respondent Savankumar Baliram Shinde from interfering with disputed joint family property and ordered Shinde to pay costs to respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts