Vimal Baban Ghante vs Ratan Ambrushi Ghante Advocate - Darape Santosh V — 15/2023
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 1. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO120007062023
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
e-Filing Number
24-03-2023
Filing Number
718/2023
Filing Date
28-03-2023
Registration No
15/2023
Registration Date
31-03-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Barshi
Judge
2-C.J.S.D.BARSHI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vimal Baban Ghante
Adv. Shankar Pandurang Nanavare
Kavita Santosh Nakade
Adv. Shankar Pandurang Nanavare
Dipali Vinay Betale
Adv. Shankar Pandurang Nanavare
Shraddha Jivan Shivshetti
Adv. Shankar Pandurang Nanavare
Kamina Manoj Gadekar
Adv. Shankar Pandurang Nanavare
Bhagyashri Raju Sakhare
Adv. Shankar Pandurang Nanavare
Aambali Abhijit Zade
Adv. Shankar Pandurang Nanavare
Yogesh Baban Ghante
Adv. Shankar Pandurang Nanavare
Respondent(s)
Ratan Ambrushi Ghante Advocate - Darape Santosh V
Anita Suresh Ghante
Priyanka Suresh Ghante
Vidya Suresh Ghante Appointed Guardian Respondent No 2 Mother
Hearing History
Judge: 2-C.J.S.D.BARSHI
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 17-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 27-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 22-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 15/2023 Outcome: The petition filed by Vimal Baban Ghante, Kavita Santosh Nakade, and Dipali Vinay Betale was ALLOWED. The court permitted the filing of public documents (a death certificate from 2001 and property-related documents) into the record and directed that costs be awarded as per rules. The respondents' objections were rejected, as the documents were deemed properly producible as public records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 15/2023 Outcome: The petition filed by Vimal Baban Ghante, Kavita Santosh Nakade, and Dipali Vinay Betale was ALLOWED. The court permitted the filing of public documents (a death certificate from 2001 and property-related documents) into the record and directed that costs be awarded as per rules. The respondents' objections were rejected, as the documents were deemed properly producible as public records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts