Yunus Noormahammad Shaikh vs Dhananjay Popat Lomate — 3/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151,152. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 13th March 2026.
M.A.N.R.J.I. - Misc. Application not requiring Judicial Inquiry
CNR: MHSO120006332025
e-Filing Number
04-09-2025
Filing Number
641/2025
Filing Date
09-09-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
09-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Barshi
Judge
2-C.J.S.D.BARSHI
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yunus Noormahammad Shaikh
Adv. MUJAWAR SARFARAZ MUSHTAQ
Respondent(s)
Dhananjay Popat Lomate
Hearing History
Judge: 2-C.J.S.D.BARSHI
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Ex_Party Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-01-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 3/2025 Yunus Noormahammad Shaikh v. Dhananjay Popat Lomate Yunus Shaikh filed a correction petition under CPC Sections 151-152 regarding his earlier lawsuit (No. 49/2020) decided on 23.07.2024. The petition sought to correct a clerical error in the court's decree—specifically, the property description mistakenly mentioned "Raleras" instead of "Rastapur" in the decree copy, though the original judgment had correctly stated "Rastapur." The court granted the petition, directing the concerned official to correct the error by striking out "Raleras" and replacing it with "Rastapur" in decree No. 62, to be countersigned and registered in the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 3/2025 Yunus Noormahammad Shaikh v. Dhananjay Popat Lomate Yunus Shaikh filed a correction petition under CPC Sections 151-152 regarding his earlier lawsuit (No. 49/2020) decided on 23.07.2024. The petition sought to correct a clerical error in the court's decree—specifically, the property description mistakenly mentioned "Raleras" instead of "Rastapur" in the decree copy, though the original judgment had correctly stated "Rastapur." The court granted the petition, directing the concerned official to correct the error by striking out "Raleras" and replacing it with "Rastapur" in decree No. 62, to be countersigned and registered in the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts