IndusInd Bank Ltd Through Randhir Mohan Mokashi vs Prashant Ngesh Bagale — 222/2021

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE on 15th April 2026.

Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast

CNR: MHSO120003722021

Case disposed

Filing Number

338/2021

Filing Date

02-03-2021

Registration No

222/2021

Registration Date

04-03-2021

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Barshi

Judge

4-Jt.C.J.S.D Barshi

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36

Petitioner(s)

IndusInd Bank Ltd Through Randhir Mohan Mokashi

Adv. Chavan Mahesh Prabhu

Respondent(s)

Prashant Ngesh Bagale

Bhalchanra vijay Wada

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Jt.C.J.S.D Barshi

15-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Steps

22-01-2026

Steps

29-11-2025

Awaiting Warrant

01-10-2025

Awaiting Warrant

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court dismissed IndusInd Bank's execution petition (A.R.D. 222/2021) in default for want of steps on 15/04/2026. The bank and its advocate were repeatedly absent from court proceedings since 2021, failed to pursue the matter despite a garnishee warrant being issued and returned unexecuted, demonstrating lack of intent to proceed. The Joint Civil Judge cited Supreme Court precedent requiring execution petitions to be completed within six months and found no justification to keep the long-pending matter alive given the decree holder's continued inaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed IndusInd Bank's execution petition (A.R.D. 222/2021) in default for want of steps on 15/04/2026. The bank and its advocate were repeatedly absent from court proceedings since 2021, failed to pursue the matter despite a garnishee warrant being issued and returned unexecuted, demonstrating lack of intent to proceed. The Joint Civil Judge cited Supreme Court precedent requiring execution petitions to be completed within six months and found no justification to keep the long-pending matter alive given the decree holder's continued inaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Barshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case