mangal rahiwale vs suresh rahiwale Advocate - Karanjkar Parashuram R — 4/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHSO120002982016
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
286/2016
Filing Date
21-04-2016
Registration No
4/2016
Registration Date
25-04-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Barshi
Judge
2-C.J.S.D.BARSHI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
mangal rahiwale
Adv. Karade Kishor V.
Respondent(s)
suresh rahiwale Advocate - Karanjkar Parashuram R
shrikant rahiwale
Adv. Karanjkar Parashuram R
prakash rahiwale
adha rahiwale
prabhakar rahiwale
Hearing History
Judge: 2-C.J.S.D.BARSHI
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 03-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 4/2016 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court issued an attachment warrant against immovable property (CTS No.4208) in Barshi Nagar Palika, District Solapur, owned by the judgment debtors, to recover an outstanding decretal amount of approximately Rs.5,60,000 that remained unpaid since November 2010. The court found willful non-compliance by the defendants despite seven years passing and minimal partial payments made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 4/2016 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court issued an attachment warrant against immovable property (CTS No.4208) in Barshi Nagar Palika, District Solapur, owned by the judgment debtors, to recover an outstanding decretal amount of approximately Rs.5,60,000 that remained unpaid since November 2010. The court found willful non-compliance by the defendants despite seven years passing and minimal partial payments made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts