State of Maharashtra vs Abhiman Garud Jadhav — 1622/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO110034882025

Filing Number

2355/2025

Filing Date

19-Sep-2025

Registration No

1622/2025

Registration Date

19-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

411

Police Station

Malshiras

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abhiman Garud Jadhav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 of BNSS) in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act case against accused Abhiman Garud Jadhav due to his continuous absence since inception and the police's negligence in securing his presence, making normal trial impossible. The prosecution may revive the case upon arresting the accused or securing his appearance with justifiable grounds; meanwhile, bail bonds are cancelled, seized liquor disposed of, and case records retained for potential re-opening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  4. 28-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1622/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 of BNSS) in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act case against accused Abhiman Garud Jadhav due to his continuous absence since inception and the police's negligence in securing his presence, making normal trial impossible. The prosecution may revive the case upon arresting the accused or securing his appearance with justifiable grounds; meanwhile, bail bonds are cancelled, seized liquor disposed of, and case records retained for potential re-opening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case