State Exice vs Vinod Uttam Dhainje — 1533/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO110034202025

Filing Number

2348/2025

Filing Date

25-Sep-2025

Registration No

1533/2025

Registration Date

25-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

182

Police Station

Malshiras

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

1.State Exice

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

1.Vinod Uttam Dhainje

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
13-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: State vs. Vinod Uttam Dhainje (STC 1533/2025) The Judicial Magistrate stayed proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Section 281 of BNSS) in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, citing the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence, making normal trial impossible. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon the accused's arrest or secured appearance with justifiable grounds; bail bonds were cancelled and seized liquor ordered disposed of per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
13-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
17-Oct-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
25-Sep-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 1533/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State vs. Vinod Uttam Dhainje (STC 1533/2025) The Judicial Magistrate stayed proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Section 281 of BNSS) in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, citing the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence, making normal trial impossible. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon the accused's arrest or secured appearance with justifiable grounds; bail bonds were cancelled and seized liquor ordered disposed of per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.