State of Maharashtra vs Gopal Yashwant Sargar Advocate - Babar Dhananjay S. — 476/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110032362020
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
2378/2020
Filing Date
29-10-2020
Registration No
476/2020
Registration Date
29-10-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
4-IVth Jt Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
FIR Details
FIR Number
225
Police Station
Akluj
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Gopal Yashwant Sargar Advocate - Babar Dhananjay S.
Sachin Lalasaheb Indalkar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-IVth Jt Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 476/2020 Summary On 25 February 2025, the Judicial Magistrate framed charges against Gopal Yashwant Sargar and Sachin Lalasaheb Indalkar for: (1) theft of cash, gold, and household goods on 21.04.2024 under IPC Section 380 read with Section 34; (2) unlicensed money-lending from 01.07.2015 to 14.04.2020 under Money Lender's Act Section 39; and (3) molestation for debt recovery under Money Lender's Act Section 45. Both accused pleaded not guilty and were directed to be tried by the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 476/2020 Summary On 25 February 2025, the Judicial Magistrate framed charges against Gopal Yashwant Sargar and Sachin Lalasaheb Indalkar for: (1) theft of cash, gold, and household goods on 21.04.2024 under IPC Section 380 read with Section 34; (2) unlicensed money-lending from 01.07.2015 to 14.04.2020 under Money Lender's Act Section 39; and (3) molestation for debt recovery under Money Lender's Act Section 45. Both accused pleaded not guilty and were directed to be tried by the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts