State of Maharashtra vs Balkrushn Dagadu Tiwari — 1500/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110028802025
Filing Number
2134/2025
Filing Date
05-08-2025
Registration No
1500/2025
Registration Date
04-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
241
Police Station
Malshiras
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Balkrushn Dagadu Tiwari
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 03-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Balkrushna Tiwari (STC No. 1500/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S (formerly Section 258 of Cr.P.C.) in this gambling offense case against Balkrushna Dagadu Tiwari, citing the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The prosecution may revive proceedings upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds. Bail bonds were cancelled, Rs. 570 seized amount forfeited to the government, and seized articles destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Balkrushna Tiwari (STC No. 1500/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S (formerly Section 258 of Cr.P.C.) in this gambling offense case against Balkrushna Dagadu Tiwari, citing the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The prosecution may revive proceedings upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds. Bail bonds were cancelled, Rs. 570 seized amount forfeited to the government, and seized articles destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts