State of Maharashtra vs Vikas Hanmant Bodare — 1498/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110028782025
Filing Number
2132/2025
Filing Date
05-Aug-2025
Registration No
1498/2025
Registration Date
11-Sep-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
238
Police Station
Malshiras
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vikas Hanmant Bodare
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Vikas Hanmant Bodare (STC 1498/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 CrPC against Vikas Hanmant Bodare for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the accused's prolonged absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence made normal trial procedures impossible. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arresting or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds. Additionally, bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor disposed per law, and police records retained for potential case reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
30-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1498/2025
Case Summary: State v. Vikas Hanmant Bodare (STC 1498/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 CrPC against Vikas Hanmant Bodare for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the accused's prolonged absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence made normal trial procedures impossible. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arresting or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds. Additionally, bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor disposed per law, and police records retained for potential case reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts