State Exice vs Ramesh Tatya Kale — 1490/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65k,f. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO110028702025

Filing Number

2124/2025

Filing Date

05-Aug-2025

Registration No

1490/2025

Registration Date

25-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

197

Police Station

Akluj

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65k,f

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Exice

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Tatya Kale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court suspended proceedings against Ramesh Tatya Kale in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(c)(f)) due to his continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The magistrate invoked Section 258 of Cr.P.C. (Section 281 of B.N.S.S), allowing the prosecution to revive proceedings upon arresting or securing the accused with justifiable grounds. Bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor forfeited to the government, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  4. 01-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1490/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court suspended proceedings against Ramesh Tatya Kale in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(c)(f)) due to his continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The magistrate invoked Section 258 of Cr.P.C. (Section 281 of B.N.S.S), allowing the prosecution to revive proceedings upon arresting or securing the accused with justifiable grounds. Bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor forfeited to the government, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case