State Exice vs Maruti Bhoju Khandekar — 1403/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110027892025
Filing Number
1994/2025
Filing Date
05-Aug-2025
Registration No
1403/2025
Registration Date
28-Aug-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
170
Police Station
Excise Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Exice
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Maruti Bhoju Khandekar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of State vs. Maruti Bhoju Khandekar (Case 1403/2025): The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act case due to the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The magistrate found it impossible to proceed normally and invoked the precedent from Mulchand Raka v. State of Maharashtra, allowing prosecution to revive proceedings upon the accused's arrest. Bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor disposed per law, and case records retained for potential future reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
30-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1403/2025
Summary of State vs. Maruti Bhoju Khandekar (Case 1403/2025): The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act case due to the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The magistrate found it impossible to proceed normally and invoked the precedent from Mulchand Raka v. State of Maharashtra, allowing prosecution to revive proceedings upon the accused's arrest. Bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor disposed per law, and case records retained for potential future reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts