State of Maharashtra vs Babasaheb Ankush Uthade — 1377/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110026892025
Filing Number
1957/2025
Filing Date
19-Jul-2025
Registration No
1377/2025
Registration Date
02-Sep-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
316
Police Station
Malshiras
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Babasaheb Ankush Uthade
-
2.Shivanand Mukund Bansode
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary (1377/2025): The court suspended proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S against accused Babasaheb Ankush Uthade and Shivanand Mukund Bansode in a gambling case, citing their continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing their presence. The prosecution retains liberty to revive the case upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds. Seized cash of Rs.180/- and bail bonds were forfeited to the government, while worthless seized items were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
13-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
28-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1377/2025
Case Summary (1377/2025): The court suspended proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S against accused Babasaheb Ankush Uthade and Shivanand Mukund Bansode in a gambling case, citing their continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing their presence. The prosecution retains liberty to revive the case upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds. Seized cash of Rs.180/- and bail bonds were forfeited to the government, while worthless seized items were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts