State of Maharashtra vs Babasaheb Ankush Uthade — 1377/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110026892025
Filing Number
1957/2025
Filing Date
19-07-2025
Registration No
1377/2025
Registration Date
02-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
316
Police Station
Malshiras
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Babasaheb Ankush Uthade
Shivanand Mukund Bansode
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 28-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary (1377/2025): The court suspended proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S against accused Babasaheb Ankush Uthade and Shivanand Mukund Bansode in a gambling case, citing their continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing their presence. The prosecution retains liberty to revive the case upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds. Seized cash of Rs.180/- and bail bonds were forfeited to the government, while worthless seized items were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary (1377/2025): The court suspended proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S against accused Babasaheb Ankush Uthade and Shivanand Mukund Bansode in a gambling case, citing their continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing their presence. The prosecution retains liberty to revive the case upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds. Seized cash of Rs.180/- and bail bonds were forfeited to the government, while worthless seized items were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts