State of Maharashtra vs Tukaram Baba Hange — 1320/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110025472025
Filing Number
1852/2025
Filing Date
04-07-2025
Registration No
1320/2025
Registration Date
11-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
203
Police Station
Malshiras
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Baba Hange
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 06-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State vs. Tukaram Baba Hange (1320/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 Cr.P.C. (Section 281 B.N.S.S) in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case against accused Tukaram Baba Hange, who has been absent since inception and lacks a Competent Authority report necessary for conviction. The court found police negligence in securing the accused's presence made normal proceedings impossible, warranting suspension with liberty to revive upon arrest or securing presence with justifiable grounds. Bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor disposed per law, and case papers retained for potential re-opening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State vs. Tukaram Baba Hange (1320/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 Cr.P.C. (Section 281 B.N.S.S) in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case against accused Tukaram Baba Hange, who has been absent since inception and lacks a Competent Authority report necessary for conviction. The court found police negligence in securing the accused's presence made normal proceedings impossible, warranting suspension with liberty to revive upon arrest or securing presence with justifiable grounds. Bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor disposed per law, and case papers retained for potential re-opening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts