State of Maharashtra vs Santosh Prakash Owal — 1315/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110025422025
Filing Number
1847/2025
Filing Date
04-Jul-2025
Registration No
1315/2025
Registration Date
11-Jul-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
183
Police Station
Malshiras
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Santosh Prakash Owal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Santosh Prakash Owal (STC 1315/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 of BNSS) in this liquor prohibition case due to the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence, making normal trial procedure impracticable. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon the accused's arrest or appearance with justifiable grounds, while bail bonds stand cancelled, seized liquor disposed of, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
30-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
02-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1315/2025
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Santosh Prakash Owal (STC 1315/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 of BNSS) in this liquor prohibition case due to the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence, making normal trial procedure impracticable. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon the accused's arrest or appearance with justifiable grounds, while bail bonds stand cancelled, seized liquor disposed of, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts