State of Maharashtra vs Shantilal Vishvanath Salave — 1310/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO110025172025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1839/2025

Filing Date

03-07-2025

Registration No

1310/2025

Registration Date

11-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

270

Police Station

Malshiras

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Shantilal Vishvanath Salave

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

13-03-2026

Disposed

30-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

02-08-2025

First Order

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State v. Shantilal Vishvanath Salave (1310/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 CrPC (Section 281 BNSS) in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act violation case because the accused remained absent since inception and no Complaint Assessment report was filed, making conviction unlikely and normal trial proceedings impossible. The prosecution retained liberty to revive proceedings upon arresting or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Shantilal Vishvanath Salave (1310/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 CrPC (Section 281 BNSS) in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act violation case because the accused remained absent since inception and no Complaint Assessment report was filed, making conviction unlikely and normal trial proceedings impossible. The prosecution retained liberty to revive proceedings upon arresting or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case