State of Maharashtra vs Bajirao Pandurang Mote — 1203/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110022982025
Filing Number
1686/2025
Filing Date
21-06-2025
Registration No
1203/2025
Registration Date
24-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
202
Police Station
Malshiras
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Bajirao Pandurang Mote
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 02-08-2025 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State vs. Bajirao Pandurang Mote (1203/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Section 281 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case against Bajirao Pandurang Mote, finding the accused continuously absent since inception and police negligent in securing his presence. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds; meanwhile, bail bonds are cancelled, seized liquor disposed of per law, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State vs. Bajirao Pandurang Mote (1203/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Section 281 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case against Bajirao Pandurang Mote, finding the accused continuously absent since inception and police negligent in securing his presence. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds; meanwhile, bail bonds are cancelled, seized liquor disposed of per law, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts