State Exice vs Ramesh Manikrao Bendre — 1169/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110022302025
Filing Number
1624/2025
Filing Date
17-Jun-2025
Registration No
1169/2025
Registration Date
15-Jul-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
112
Police Station
Excise Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Exice
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramesh Manikrao Bendre
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Ramesh Manikrao Bendre (1169/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Section 281 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, finding the accused absent since inception and the police negligent in securing his presence. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arresting or securing the accused with justifiable grounds. Bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor disposed per law, and case files retained for potential re-opening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
28-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
29-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1169/2025
Case Summary: State v. Ramesh Manikrao Bendre (1169/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Section 281 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, finding the accused absent since inception and the police negligent in securing his presence. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arresting or securing the accused with justifiable grounds. Bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor disposed per law, and case files retained for potential re-opening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts