State of Maharashtra vs Tatya Kolekar — 1100345/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 29th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110021292015
Filing Number
1100345/2015
Filing Date
10-06-2015
Registration No
1100345/2015
Registration Date
11-06-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
29th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
39
Police Station
Malshiras
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tatya Kolekar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 13-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 26-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tatya Kolekar (Case 1100345/2015) The court acquitted Tatya Kolekar of charges under IPC Section 379 (theft) and related provisions. While police testimony indicated the accused was transporting sugarcane in a tractor-trailer, the prosecution failed to establish through solid evidence that the sugarcane was stolen government property or that the accused knew of the theft. The court found insufficient direct proof linking the accused to the crime, resulting in his acquittal and bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tatya Kolekar (Case 1100345/2015) The court acquitted Tatya Kolekar of charges under IPC Section 379 (theft) and related provisions. While police testimony indicated the accused was transporting sugarcane in a tractor-trailer, the prosecution failed to establish through solid evidence that the sugarcane was stolen government property or that the accused knew of the theft. The court found insufficient direct proof linking the accused to the crime, resulting in his acquittal and bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts