State of Maharashtra vs Nandkumar Dattu Thombare — 1043/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110021122025
Filing Number
1458/2025
Filing Date
12-Jun-2025
Registration No
1043/2025
Registration Date
02-Jul-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
153
Police Station
Natepute
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nandkumar Dattu Thombare
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case against Nandkumar Dattu Thombare for an alleged liquor offense, citing the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The prosecution retains liberty to revive the case upon arrest or securing the accused's appearance with justifiable grounds, while any bail bonds are cancelled and cash security forfeited to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
IInd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
13-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
IInd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
27-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
IInd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
05-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1043/2025
The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case against Nandkumar Dattu Thombare for an alleged liquor offense, citing the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The prosecution retains liberty to revive the case upon arrest or securing the accused's appearance with justifiable grounds, while any bail bonds are cancelled and cash security forfeited to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts