State of Maharashtra vs Dilip Maroti Khilare — 694/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65f. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110020192024
Filing Number
1153/2024
Filing Date
05-07-2024
Registration No
694/2024
Registration Date
05-07-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
Excise Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Dilip Maroti Khilare
Hearing History
Judge: 2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 28-03-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-03-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 19-02-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act case against accused Pyaremiya Mulani for an offense under Section 65(e), citing the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The prosecution was granted liberty to revive proceedings upon the accused's arrest, while bail bonds were cancelled, cash security forfeited, seized liquor destroyed, and case records retained for potential future reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC in this Maharashtra Prohibition Act case against accused Pyaremiya Mulani for an offense under Section 65(e), citing the accused's continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The prosecution was granted liberty to revive proceedings upon the accused's arrest, while bail bonds were cancelled, cash security forfeited, seized liquor destroyed, and case records retained for potential future reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts