State Exice vs Jaykisan Doryodhan Kalel — 618/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO110018072024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1059/2024

Filing Date

24-06-2024

Registration No

618/2024

Registration Date

24-06-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras

Judge

2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

206

Police Station

Natepute

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 185

Petitioner(s)

State Exice

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Jaykisan Doryodhan Kalel

Hearing History

Judge: 2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

02-07-2025

Unready Board

17-04-2025

Unready Board

20-01-2025

Unready Board

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jaykisan Duryodhan Kalel (618/2024) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in this Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 offense case due to the accused's persistent absence since inception and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite summons issuance. The court granted the prosecution liberty to revive the case upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds, while canceling any bail bonds and forfeiting cash security to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jaykisan Duryodhan Kalel (618/2024) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in this Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 offense case due to the accused's persistent absence since inception and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite summons issuance. The court granted the prosecution liberty to revive the case upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds, while canceling any bail bonds and forfeiting cash security to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case