State of Maharashtra vs Mahadeo Tulshiram Popalbhat — 867/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110016562025
Filing Number
1158/2025
Filing Date
24-04-2025
Registration No
867/2025
Registration Date
02-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
176
Police Station
Malshiras
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Mahadeo Tulshiram Popalbhat
Ambadas Maruti Kengar
Vijay Dnyandeo Javir
Lala Hanumant Javir
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 26-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-07-2025 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Mahadev Popalbhat & Others (STC 867/2025) The Judicial Magistrate suspended proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S (Section 258 Cr.P.C.) in this gambling offense case because the three accused have been absent since inception, making normal trial proceedings impossible. The court found the police negligent in securing the accused's presence and invoked established precedent allowing suspension in such circumstances, with liberty to the prosecution to revive proceedings upon arrest or securing presence. The court forfeited seized cash (₹36,390), destroyed worthless items, and ordered motorcycles returned to registered owners after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Mahadev Popalbhat & Others (STC 867/2025) The Judicial Magistrate suspended proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S (Section 258 Cr.P.C.) in this gambling offense case because the three accused have been absent since inception, making normal trial proceedings impossible. The court found the police negligent in securing the accused's presence and invoked established precedent allowing suspension in such circumstances, with liberty to the prosecution to revive proceedings upon arrest or securing presence. The court forfeited seized cash (₹36,390), destroyed worthless items, and ordered motorcycles returned to registered owners after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts