State Exice vs Balshing Babanshing Rajput — 449/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO110010312025
Filing Number
669/2025
Filing Date
20-03-2025
Registration No
449/2025
Registration Date
20-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
Police Station
Excise Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Exice
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Balshing Babanshing Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 18-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 15-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-04-2025 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State vs. Balsing Babansing Rajput (STC 449/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 of BNSS) in this liquor prohibition case against accused Balsing Babansing Rajput due to his continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The court found conviction prospects impossible without a Competent Authority report and cited the High Court precedent permitting suspension in such special circumstances. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds; bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor disposed per law, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State vs. Balsing Babansing Rajput (STC 449/2025) The court suspended proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 of BNSS) in this liquor prohibition case against accused Balsing Babansing Rajput due to his continuous absence since inception and police negligence in securing his presence. The court found conviction prospects impossible without a Competent Authority report and cited the High Court precedent permitting suspension in such special circumstances. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arrest or securing the accused's presence with justifiable grounds; bail bonds were cancelled, seized liquor disposed per law, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts