Suraj Sanjay Sakhare vs State Exice — 59/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO110009152026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
632/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
59/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
8-IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Akluj
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Suraj Sanjay Sakhare
Adv. Gaikwad Ramchandra Dattatraya
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Exice
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Suraj Sanjay Sakhare v. State Excise (59/2026) The court granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of his seized vehicle. The vehicle (Registration No. MH.45.A.Q. 4956, Chassis No. 24490, Engine No. 11464) was seized by the State Excise Department under the Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65. The court found the petitioner had prima facie ownership through documented registration and daily usage, ordering return of the vehicle upon deposit of ₹5,00,000 surety with conditions: no structural modifications, no third-party interest creation, and court production as required. The inspector was directed to prepare detailed panchnama with photographs before release and return the vehicle after insurance documentation is submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 59/2026
Case Summary: Suraj Sanjay Sakhare v. State Excise (59/2026) The court granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of his seized vehicle. The vehicle (Registration No. MH.45.A.Q. 4956, Chassis No. 24490, Engine No. 11464) was seized by the State Excise Department under the Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65. The court found the petitioner had prima facie ownership through documented registration and daily usage, ordering return of the vehicle upon deposit of ₹5,00,000 surety with conditions: no structural modifications, no third-party interest creation, and court production as required. The inspector was directed to prepare detailed panchnama with photographs before release and return the vehicle after insurance documentation is submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts