Govardhan Mahadeo Mane vs State of Maharashtra — 53/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO110007482026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
540/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
8-IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govardhan Mahadeo Mane
Adv. Ranjit Shakar Bhosale
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 8-IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 17-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Govardhan Mahadeo Mane v. State of Maharashtra (53/2026) The court granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of his Tata Motors vehicle (Registration MH-11-AL-0258) seized by Akluj Police in FIR 68/2026 for noise pollution and environmental violations. The court found the petitioner to be the registered owner based on submitted documents and approved return of the vehicle upon deposit of ₹11,00,000 security bond, subject to conditions including maintaining vehicle integrity, non-interference with evidence, and production before court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Govardhan Mahadeo Mane v. State of Maharashtra (53/2026) The court granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of his Tata Motors vehicle (Registration MH-11-AL-0258) seized by Akluj Police in FIR 68/2026 for noise pollution and environmental violations. The court found the petitioner to be the registered owner based on submitted documents and approved return of the vehicle upon deposit of ₹11,00,000 security bond, subject to conditions including maintaining vehicle integrity, non-interference with evidence, and production before court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts