Satish Ashok Kunjir vs State of Maharashtra — 50/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO110007262026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
519/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
50/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
8-IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
Akluj
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Satish Ashok Kunjir
Adv. JADHAV PANKAJ SURESH
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 8-IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 17-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 50/2026 The court granted Satish Ashok Kunjir's petition for return of his seized Tata Motors vehicle (Registration No. MH-12-GT-1104) under CrPC Section 503. The court found the petitioner to be the prima facie owner based on registration documents, and ordered the vehicle released upon deposit of Rs. 9,00,000 with conditions that the vehicle not be altered and be produced before court as directed. The police were instructed to conduct a detailed panchnama with photographs before release and attach these documents to the chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 50/2026 The court granted Satish Ashok Kunjir's petition for return of his seized Tata Motors vehicle (Registration No. MH-12-GT-1104) under CrPC Section 503. The court found the petitioner to be the prima facie owner based on registration documents, and ordered the vehicle released upon deposit of Rs. 9,00,000 with conditions that the vehicle not be altered and be produced before court as directed. The police were instructed to conduct a detailed panchnama with photographs before release and attach these documents to the chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts