Vaibhav Keshav Magar vs Keshav Anna Magar — 183/2026
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO110006752026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
212/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
183/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vaibhav Keshav Magar
Adv. Nimbalkar Sambhaji S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Keshav Anna Magar
-
2.Vidya Keshav Magar
-
3.Srushti Keshav Magar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 183/2026 Summary: The National Lok Adalat decreed the suit between Vaibhav Keshav Magar and respondents Keshav Anna Magar, Vidya Keshav Magar, and Srushti Keshav Magar based on a compromise deed voluntarily filed by all parties. The court found the settlement was amicable and all parties admitted to and authenticated the compromise deed's contents. The suit was disposed accordingly with court fee refund issued to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
13-Mar-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
10-Mar-2026
First Order
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 183/2026
Case 183/2026 Summary: The National Lok Adalat decreed the suit between Vaibhav Keshav Magar and respondents Keshav Anna Magar, Vidya Keshav Magar, and Srushti Keshav Magar based on a compromise deed voluntarily filed by all parties. The court found the settlement was amicable and all parties admitted to and authenticated the compromise deed's contents. The suit was disposed accordingly with court fee refund issued to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts