Rajendra Machindra Lokhande vs State of Maharashtra — 42/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO110005542026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
404/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
42/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
8-IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
Akluj
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Machindra Lokhande
Adv. BARGE RANJIT SHASHIKANT
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 8-IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Rajendra Machindra Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra (42/2026) The court granted the petitioner's application for interim custody of seized gold jewelry (a chain, bracelet, and ring) under IPC Section 503, requiring him to furnish a security bond of ₹3,23,000 and comply with conditions including presentation before the investigation officer and restriction on transferring or using the items until trial conclusion. The jewelry will be returned through an official panchnama with photographs and sealed in the court record after inspection by a certified goldsmith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Rajendra Machindra Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra (42/2026) The court granted the petitioner's application for interim custody of seized gold jewelry (a chain, bracelet, and ring) under IPC Section 503, requiring him to furnish a security bond of ₹3,23,000 and comply with conditions including presentation before the investigation officer and restriction on transferring or using the items until trial conclusion. The jewelry will be returned through an official panchnama with photographs and sealed in the court record after inspection by a certified goldsmith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts