Manoj Madhukar Pol vs Rahul Madhukar Pol Advocate - Shaikh Sajid H. — 266/2024
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 06. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO110004492024
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2024
Filing Number
304/2024
Filing Date
26-02-2024
Registration No
266/2024
Registration Date
01-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
8-IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manoj Madhukar Pol
Adv. KULKARNI MILIND VISHNUPANT
Respondent(s)
Rahul Madhukar Pol Advocate - Shaikh Sajid H.
Hearing History
Judge: 8-IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 03-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY In Civil Case 266/2024 before the Senior Civil Court, Malshiras, the court allowed Respondent No. 3's application for condonation of delay in filing written statement, ordering him to pay costs of Rs. 200/- to the petitioner. The court granted Respondent No. 3 an opportunity to participate in the proceedings and file his written statement and arguments, recognizing that both parties have interests in the property matter at hand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY In Civil Case 266/2024 before the Senior Civil Court, Malshiras, the court allowed Respondent No. 3's application for condonation of delay in filing written statement, ordering him to pay costs of Rs. 200/- to the petitioner. The court granted Respondent No. 3 an opportunity to participate in the proceedings and file his written statement and arguments, recognizing that both parties have interests in the property matter at hand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts