Ramesh Navnath Jadhav vs Laxmi Shivaji Ingole — 39/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 16. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO110000922024

e-Filing Number

16-01-2024

Filing Number

44/2024

Filing Date

24-Jan-2024

Registration No

39/2024

Registration Date

09-Feb-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras

Judge

8-IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Navnath Jadhav

    Adv. Patil S. B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Laxmi Shivaji Ingole

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 39/2024 Summary The court allowed the petitioner Ramesh Navnath Jadhav's application seeking delay condonation and directions against respondent Laxmi Shivaji Ingole regarding a property dispute. The respondent was ordered to pay Rs. 500/- as costs and file a written statement within the prescribed time; upon payment of costs, the delay in filing will be condoned. The court directed the respondent to participate in proceedings to ensure fair adjudication of the property matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  6. 16-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  7. 28-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  8. 22-Sep-2025

    No W.S. Order

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  9. 14-Aug-2025

    No W.S. Order

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  10. 26-Jun-2025

    No W.S. Order

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  11. 05-Apr-2025

    No W.S. Order

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  12. 27-Feb-2025

    No W.S. Order

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  13. 22-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  14. 10-Dec-2024

    W.S. and Say

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  15. 08-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  16. 08-Oct-2024

    W.S. and Say

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  17. 09-Sep-2024

    W.S. and Say

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  18. 17-Aug-2024

    W.S. and Say

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  19. 02-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  20. 24-Apr-2024

    First Order

    IIIrd Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

  21. 23-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 24-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 39/2024 Summary The court allowed the petitioner Ramesh Navnath Jadhav's application seeking delay condonation and directions against respondent Laxmi Shivaji Ingole regarding a property dispute. The respondent was ordered to pay Rs. 500/- as costs and file a written statement within the prescribed time; upon payment of costs, the delay in filing will be condoned. The court directed the respondent to participate in proceedings to ensure fair adjudication of the property matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case