Mangesh Mane Deshmukh vs Gram Panchayat Chaundeshwarwadi Tarfe Sarpanch — 10/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO110000302026
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
05-01-2026
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
05-01-2026
Registration No
10/2026
Registration Date
05-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malshiras
Judge
2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mangesh Mane Deshmukh
Adv. PORE BHOJRAJ CHANDRAKANT
Respondent(s)
Gram Panchayat Chaundeshwarwadi Tarfe Sarpanch
Hearing History
Judge: 2-IInd Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 27-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Mangesh Mane Deshmukh v. Gram Panchayat Chaundeshwarwadi Petition Dismissed (Appeal Denied) The court rejected the petitioner's plea to halt an e-tender for concrete road construction awarded to a third-party contractor. The petitioner, a registered government contractor who submitted a 9.9% lower bid, claimed procedural violations in technical evaluation. The court found that the tender constitutes only an "invitation to offer" and no binding contract existed between the petitioner and panchayat prior to acceptance. The court ruled the panchayat had authority to accept the third party's bid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mangesh Mane Deshmukh v. Gram Panchayat Chaundeshwarwadi Petition Dismissed (Appeal Denied) The court rejected the petitioner's plea to halt an e-tender for concrete road construction awarded to a third-party contractor. The petitioner, a registered government contractor who submitted a 9.9% lower bid, claimed procedural violations in technical evaluation. The court found that the tender constitutes only an "invitation to offer" and no binding contract existed between the petitioner and panchayat prior to acceptance. The court ruled the panchayat had authority to accept the third party's bid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts