Sarjerav Pandharinath Durape and 3 vs Manohar Ramchandra Durape and 3 Advocate - Kadam Prashant Narayan — 635/2022
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO100022602022
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
1680/2022
Filing Date
12-10-2022
Registration No
635/2022
Registration Date
12-10-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarjerav Pandharinath Durape and 3
Adv. Kadam Ganesh P.
Respondent(s)
Manohar Ramchandra Durape and 3 Advocate - Kadam Prashant Narayan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 635/2022 The court allowed the petition filed by the heirs of deceased plaintiff Sarjerav Pandharinath Durape (who died on 22.01.2025) seeking to include his five legal heirs in the suit record as per succession procedure. The court permitted the substitution of the deceased plaintiff with his heirs (one son and four daughters) as parties to the case, finding that procedural substitution would not prejudice the defendant and was necessary for justice. The application (Ni.Kr. 45) was granted on 23.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 635/2022 The court allowed the petition filed by the heirs of deceased plaintiff Sarjerav Pandharinath Durape (who died on 22.01.2025) seeking to include his five legal heirs in the suit record as per succession procedure. The court permitted the substitution of the deceased plaintiff with his heirs (one son and four daughters) as parties to the case, finding that procedural substitution would not prejudice the defendant and was necessary for justice. The application (Ni.Kr. 45) was granted on 23.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts