Pandhurang Padhare 4 vs Ramchandra Pandhare 29 Advocate - Gade Rajashree Ramchndra — 610/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Partitionandinjunction. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO100013472023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
740/2023
Filing Date
23-02-2023
Registration No
610/2023
Registration Date
23-02-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandhurang Padhare 4
Adv. Pisal Shivaji S.
Respondent(s)
Ramchandra Pandhare 29 Advocate - Gade Rajashree Ramchndra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 610/2023 Petition: Allowed Petitioner: Pandhurang Padhare Respondents: Ramchandra Pandhare and others The court granted the petitioner's application for amendment/rectification of a pending property dispute case. The petitioner sought amendments to describe encroached land areas on his plots (Gat nos. 725/4 and 725/10) after a Court Commissioner's survey report revealed unauthorized occupation by respondents. The court permitted the requested amendments within 14 days, finding that rectifications were necessary to accurately reflect the encroachments identified during the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 610/2023 Petition: Allowed Petitioner: Pandhurang Padhare Respondents: Ramchandra Pandhare and others The court granted the petitioner's application for amendment/rectification of a pending property dispute case. The petitioner sought amendments to describe encroached land areas on his plots (Gat nos. 725/4 and 725/10) after a Court Commissioner's survey report revealed unauthorized occupation by respondents. The court permitted the requested amendments within 14 days, finding that rectifications were necessary to accurately reflect the encroachments identified during the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts