Prakash Vishnu Khandare vs Rajendra Vishnu Khandare etc — 161/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO100011972022
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
1087/2022
Filing Date
22-09-2022
Registration No
161/2022
Registration Date
22-09-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prakash Vishnu Khandare
Adv. Waghmode Ramchandra S.
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Vishnu Khandare etc
Dattatray Vishnu Khandare
Laxmi Vishnu Khandare
Shobha Subhash Khandare
Pramod Subhash Khandare
Priyanka Subhash Khandare
Sudam Ramchandra Shinde
Vikas Sudam Shinde
Vishal Sudam Shinde
Seema Sudam Shinde
Tanaji Tukaram Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS.NO.161/2022 Outcome: Application allowed. The court granted Prakash Vishnu Khandare's application to amend the plaint by correcting the boundaries of the suit property. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the amendment accordingly. The court found that correcting boundary descriptions does not introduce a new case and causes no prejudice to defendant No.11, placing the burden on the plaintiff to prove the correct boundaries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS.NO.161/2022 Outcome: Application allowed. The court granted Prakash Vishnu Khandare's application to amend the plaint by correcting the boundaries of the suit property. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the amendment accordingly. The court found that correcting boundary descriptions does not introduce a new case and causes no prejudice to defendant No.11, placing the burden on the plaintiff to prove the correct boundaries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts