GANESH SARV SEVA SANGH SHREEPUR THROUGH BALASAHEB AUDUMBAR AWATADE vs VASANT ARJUN MADANE — 95/2025

Case under Indian Contract Act Section 43. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHSO100008982025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

08-07-2025

Filing Number

887/2025

Filing Date

06-08-2025

Registration No

95/2025

Registration Date

06-08-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras

Acts & Sections

Indian Contract Act Section 43

Petitioner(s)

GANESH SARV SEVA SANGH SHREEPUR THROUGH BALASAHEB AUDUMBAR AWATADE

Adv. DEO SUHAS BALKRISHNA

Respondent(s)

VASANT ARJUN MADANE

SANTOSH NAMDEV LAWAND

SAMBHAJI SHIVAJI BHOSALE

NAGESH ANNASAHEB BHOSALE

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras

27-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

18-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

13-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

30-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

15-12-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Interim Orders

18-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 95/2025 The court allowed Respondent No. 2's application for condonation of delay in filing his affidavit/statement in response to the petitioner's application. Respondent No. 2 explained that he could not file the affidavit timely due to non-availability of important documents. The court found the delay of approximately 4 months and 25 days reasonable and condoned it, permitting him to file his response. Additionally, the court ordered that Respondent No. 2 must pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to the petitioner as a condition for this condonation (Order dated 18.04.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 95/2025 The court allowed Respondent No. 2's application for condonation of delay in filing his affidavit/statement in response to the petitioner's application. Respondent No. 2 explained that he could not file the affidavit timely due to non-availability of important documents. The court found the delay of approximately 4 months and 25 days reasonable and condoned it, permitting him to file his response. Additionally, the court ordered that Respondent No. 2 must pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to the petitioner as a condition for this condonation (Order dated 18.04.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case