GANESH SARV SEVA SANGH SHREEPUR THROUGH BALASAHEB AUDUMBAR AWATADE vs VASANT ARJUN MADANE — 95/2025
Case under Indian Contract Act Section 43. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHSO100008982025
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
08-07-2025
Filing Number
887/2025
Filing Date
06-08-2025
Registration No
95/2025
Registration Date
06-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GANESH SARV SEVA SANGH SHREEPUR THROUGH BALASAHEB AUDUMBAR AWATADE
Adv. DEO SUHAS BALKRISHNA
Respondent(s)
VASANT ARJUN MADANE
SANTOSH NAMDEV LAWAND
SAMBHAJI SHIVAJI BHOSALE
NAGESH ANNASAHEB BHOSALE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 18-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 30-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 15-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 95/2025 The court allowed Respondent No. 2's application for condonation of delay in filing his affidavit/statement in response to the petitioner's application. Respondent No. 2 explained that he could not file the affidavit timely due to non-availability of important documents. The court found the delay of approximately 4 months and 25 days reasonable and condoned it, permitting him to file his response. Additionally, the court ordered that Respondent No. 2 must pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to the petitioner as a condition for this condonation (Order dated 18.04.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 95/2025 The court allowed Respondent No. 2's application for condonation of delay in filing his affidavit/statement in response to the petitioner's application. Respondent No. 2 explained that he could not file the affidavit timely due to non-availability of important documents. The court found the delay of approximately 4 months and 25 days reasonable and condoned it, permitting him to file his response. Additionally, the court ordered that Respondent No. 2 must pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to the petitioner as a condition for this condonation (Order dated 18.04.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts