Pradip Chandrakant Rakale vs Ajit Shrinivas Rakale Advocate - Waghmode Ramchandra S. — 108/2020
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHSO100005172020
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
529/2020
Filing Date
04-12-2020
Registration No
108/2020
Registration Date
17-12-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pradip Chandrakant Rakale
Adv. Kulkarni Milind Vishnupant
Respondent(s)
Ajit Shrinivas Rakale Advocate - Waghmode Ramchandra S.
Sanjay Shriniwas Rakale
Lata Santosh Madde
Shaileja Chandrakant Petkar
Mina Ramesh Metti
Pritam Ramesh Rakale
Rajesh Ramesh Rakale
Vedvani Kishor Sagar
Asha Pramod Angarkar
M/s. Samruddhi Enterprise Partner Kedar Sanjiv Khadake
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Steps_Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 09-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 05-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 15-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: VVD Order 108/2020 The petitioner filed an application seeking correction of a typographical error in the original suit, where Respondent No. 3's name was wrongly recorded as "Lata Santosh Madde" instead of "Lata Sangram Madde" (as confirmed by the bailiff's report). The court allowed the petition, approving the requested correction to be made in the original suit within 14 days. The respondent's objection that the application was frivolous was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: VVD Order 108/2020 The petitioner filed an application seeking correction of a typographical error in the original suit, where Respondent No. 3's name was wrongly recorded as "Lata Santosh Madde" instead of "Lata Sangram Madde" (as confirmed by the bailiff's report). The court allowed the petition, approving the requested correction to be made in the original suit within 14 days. The respondent's objection that the application was frivolous was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts