Shahaji Digambar Kadam vs The State Advocate - Deo Suhas B. — 1000013/2008
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 6. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE on 05th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO100003852008
Filing Number
1000419/2008
Filing Date
19-09-2008
Registration No
1000013/2008
Registration Date
20-09-2008
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shahaji Digambar Kadam
Adv. Bhosale Shahaji L.
Respondent(s)
The State Advocate - Deo Suhas B.
VINAYAK NAMDEV KADAM.
DEEPAK GOUTAM PATIL.
KULDEEPAK GOUTAM PATIL.
BRAMHADEV OUTUMBAR KADAM
NAMDEV VASUDEV KADAM.
BALKRISHNA VASUDEV KADAM
BABASO AAGATRAO SAVANT.
BAPU AAGATRAO SAVANT.
SHUBHAM BABASO SAVANT.
ANIL SOPANRAO MHANKAL
SULOCHANA PANDURANG DESHMUKH.
TUKARAMTULSHIRAM BABU PARSE.
SATISH CHANDRAMOHAN KADAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court approved a compromise settlement between plaintiff Shahaji Digambar Kadam and defendants no. 3 and 4 (Vinayak Namdev Kadam and Deepak Goutam Patil) after all parties admitted to the compromise terms on May 5, 2026. A compromise decree was drawn up accordingly, with each party bearing their own costs and court fees refunded as per rule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court approved a compromise settlement between plaintiff Shahaji Digambar Kadam and defendants no. 3 and 4 (Vinayak Namdev Kadam and Deepak Goutam Patil) after all parties admitted to the compromise terms on May 5, 2026. A compromise decree was drawn up accordingly, with each party bearing their own costs and court fees refunded as per rule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts