USHA SAHEBRAO KAVITKE vs SAHEBRAO MARUTI KAVITKE — 1000005/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section o21,R6. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHSO100002912014
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
1000314/2014
Filing Date
24-11-2014
Registration No
1000005/2014
Registration Date
24-11-2014
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
USHA SAHEBRAO KAVITKE
Adv. Waghmode Rajendra Manik
Respondent(s)
SAHEBRAO MARUTI KAVITKE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 09-02-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 13-01-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 23-12-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this maintenance recovery execution case, the court issued an attachment warrant on 14/08/2024 to recover a 10-year-old pending maintenance decree against Sahebrao Maruti Kavitke. Specific agricultural properties (gat numbers 202, 206/1, 229, and 188) in village Kothale were ordered to be attached to the extent of the respondent's equal share. The bailiff was directed to prioritize execution given the decade-long delay, while the respondent's advocate indicated potential settlement during execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this maintenance recovery execution case, the court issued an attachment warrant on 14/08/2024 to recover a 10-year-old pending maintenance decree against Sahebrao Maruti Kavitke. Specific agricultural properties (gat numbers 202, 206/1, 229, and 188) in village Kothale were ordered to be attached to the extent of the respondent's equal share. The bailiff was directed to prioritize execution given the decade-long delay, while the respondent's advocate indicated potential settlement during execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts