Sou. Vimal Murlidhar Bhosale vs State of Maharashtra etc Advocate - Patil Subhash B. — 1000046/2013
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO100001902013
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1000210/2013
Filing Date
11-09-2013
Registration No
1000046/2013
Registration Date
11-09-2013
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sou. Vimal Murlidhar Bhosale
Adv. Phade Dilip A.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra etc Advocate - Patil Subhash B.
Up Vibhagiya Adhikari Akluj
Vyavasthapak Maharastr State Sheti Mahamandal
Shrirang Dhodi Bhosale, Dead(Legal Heir)
Jagannath Dhodi Bhosale
Kalavati Govinda Jadhav
Vithal Pandurang Thorat
Arjun Ashok Aaglave
Ankush Ashok Aaglave
Sujata Sanjit Parade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 46/2013 The suit against defendant No. 4C3 has been ordered to proceed ex-parte. Although the RPAD (Registered Post Acknowledgment Due) acknowledgment was not received, the court found that summons were validly issued to the defendant's correct address, and the plaintiff provided postal department confirmation of delivery. The court therefore deemed service of summons complete and directed the case to proceed without the defendant's participation. (Civil Judge Senior Division, Malshiras, 12/12/2024) This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 46/2013 The suit against defendant No. 4C3 has been ordered to proceed ex-parte. Although the RPAD (Registered Post Acknowledgment Due) acknowledgment was not received, the court found that summons were validly issued to the defendant's correct address, and the plaintiff provided postal department confirmation of delivery. The court therefore deemed service of summons complete and directed the case to proceed without the defendant's participation. (Civil Judge Senior Division, Malshiras, 12/12/2024) This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts