Ranjana Ganpat Kolekar vs Tanaji Dagadu Ghule Advocate - Waghmare Virendra Popatrao — 3/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 20th April 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO100001682025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-02-2025

Filing Number

157/2025

Filing Date

11-02-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

18-02-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 151

Petitioner(s)

Ranjana Ganpat Kolekar

Adv. BAGNAWAR SAVITA MARUTI

Respondent(s)

Tanaji Dagadu Ghule Advocate - Waghmare Virendra Popatrao

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras

20-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Arguments

20-02-2026

Evidence

17-01-2026

Evidence

11-12-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 3/2025 The court approved the petitioner Ranjana Ganpat Kolekar's application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, with reasonable grounds established: the petitioner was ill and unable to approach the court within the prescribed period to file a review petition for a property-related case. The court granted the delay condonation and ordered the petitioner to pay Rs. 2,000 as costs to the respondent, allowing the review petition to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 3/2025 The court approved the petitioner Ranjana Ganpat Kolekar's application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, with reasonable grounds established: the petitioner was ill and unable to approach the court within the prescribed period to file a review petition for a property-related case. The court granted the delay condonation and ordered the petitioner to pay Rs. 2,000 as costs to the respondent, allowing the review petition to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case