Sahkar Mahrshi Shankarrao Mohite Patil Bigashete Patsantha C/o- Vikrant Madhukar Dhotre vs Aktar Hussain Pathan Advocate - Atar Altap B. — 4/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO100000702018
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
52/2018
Filing Date
06-02-2018
Registration No
4/2018
Registration Date
27-02-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Malshiras
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sahkar Mahrshi Shankarrao Mohite Patil Bigashete Patsantha C/o- Vikrant Madhukar Dhotre
Adv. Kshirsagar Bharat Ganpatrao
Respondent(s)
Aktar Hussain Pathan Advocate - Atar Altap B.
Vishal Viswas Shirke
Rakesh Gorakh Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Malshiras
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 11-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Special Application 4/2018 Court: Civil Court, Senior Division, Malshiras Date: 20/03/2024 Outcome: Case adjourned for evidence. The court framed two issues for trial: 1. Whether the petitioner (cooperative bank) owes any amount to the respondent (debtor) 2. Both parties permitted to present oral and documentary evidence on the issues framed The court declined to dismiss the petitioner's application but rejected the respondent's counter-claim that ₹7,00,000 in loan was never disbursed, finding factual disputes requiring evidence from both sides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Special Application 4/2018 Court: Civil Court, Senior Division, Malshiras Date: 20/03/2024 Outcome: Case adjourned for evidence. The court framed two issues for trial: 1. Whether the petitioner (cooperative bank) owes any amount to the respondent (debtor) 2. Both parties permitted to present oral and documentary evidence on the issues framed The court declined to dismiss the petitioner's application but rejected the respondent's counter-claim that ₹7,00,000 in loan was never disbursed, finding factual disputes requiring evidence from both sides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts